Before the Illinois Commerce Commission
Surrebuttal testimony on issues of “prudence” and the usage of the PAC and TRC tests.
Consultants on Green Energy Investment Planning and Management
Surrebuttal testimony on issues of “prudence” and the usage of the PAC and TRC tests.
Rebuttal testimony refuting the disallowance of incentives for natural gas energy efficiency measures.
Direct testimony describing Philadelphia Gas Work’s (PGW) Five-year Natural Gas Demand Side Management (DSM) Portfolio.
Plunkett replies to surrebuttal testimony submitted by DPS witness Poor opposing the 12-year Order of Appointment and insisting on an Overall Performance Assessment prior to the initial appointment of VEIC and BED as Vermont’s Energy Efficiency Utilities. Plunkett’s testimony also refutes the Department’s arguments against recognizing the favorable results in his performance comparison of VEIC with other efficiency portfolio administrators in the region
Testimony rebutting Prefiled Direct Testimony opposing the Order of Appointment mechanism, the appointment term, and performance review cycle proposed by VEIC. It also addresses the role of the proposed EEU Facilitator under an Order of Appointment, as well as how additional external funding that may be provided for EEU activities in the future should be treated.